Odyssey Victory salvage plan hit by fresh revelations

Related Articles

Loss of HMS Victory 1744 : Wiki Commons

The troubled HMS Victory 1744 Project faces fresh problems on two fronts reports Andy Brockman

The plan for American treasure hunting salvage company, Odyssey Marine Exploration Inc, to salvage the wreck of HMS Victory, flagship of Admiral Sir John Balchen lost in a storm with all hands in October 1744 has been dealt two fresh blows.

 

Odyssey is already beset by questions over the nature and terms of the commercial salvage contract the Florida based company has entered into with the wrecks owner, British charity the Maritime Heritage Foundation.  The company and its UK PR representatives the Brunswick Group have also faced accusations, reported by Heritage Daily, that a recent attack on English Heritage over its treatment of the HMS Victory site in the Sunday Times was designed as an attempt to intimidate or discredit that organisation, the UK Government’s statutory advisor on heritage matters, in advance of a government decision on how to proceed with the management of the Victory wreck site.

Now Odyssey now finds that its moral authority to work on the site, which is the grave and memorial to over a thousand Royal Navy sailors and the authority and competence of the final arbiters of any work on the site, the Ministry of Defence, are both under severe question.  In fact some authoritative sources go so far as to suggest that work on the site will have to be suspended by the Cameron Government pending a full review of the nature of the Maritime Heritage Foundation’s financial resources- or rather the lack of them.

This new crisis for Odyssey has come about because, in a response to a Freedom of Information Act request from the Joint Nautical Archaeology Policy Committee [JNAPC], the Ministry of Defence has been forced to admit that it has no record that its officials made any attempt to establish what financial resources were available to the Maritime Heritage Foundation to undertake the HMS Victory Project prior to the ship being “gifted” to the Foundation earlier this year.

This failure of the Ministry of Defence to undertake what is basic “due diligence” regarding the Maritime Heritage Foundation, which is chaired by senior Conservative Peer Lord Lingfield, is critical because the British Government has repeatedly stated that the Annex to the 2001 “UNESCO Convention on the protection of the underwater cultural heritage” represents British policy for the treatment of historic wrecks.  Rule 17 of the UNESCO Annex states that, except in an emergency, adequate funding to see a project through to completion must be shown to be in place before any work is allowed to start.

Although the salvage company has consistently argued, based on its own surveys, that the site is under threat from damage by trawlers and other commercial salvors, at no stage has Odyssey, or the Maritime Heritage Foundation, argued that this represents an emergency in the terms of the UNESCO Annex. It follows that the Ministry of Defence has failed to follow the government’s own stated policy and thus it is argued by the JNAPC and others, that work on the wreck site must be suspended until the Foundation can prove it has the independent financial means to complete what is bound to be a sensitive and expensive project on an internationally important shipwreck site.

Odyssey Explorer in Falmouth Docks Wiki Commons

Estimates for the cost of the salvage planned by Odyssey are as high as £20 million and current indications are that the Maritime Heritage Foundation actually has no independent financial resources at all.  In fact, with the company flagship, Odyssey Explorer, authorised to undertake non-invasive work at the site, it appears the Foundation may be stacking up hundreds thousands of pounds worth of debts to Odyssey under its salvage contract.  Debts which Odyssey hopes will be paid off in cash- which the Foundation does not have; or through the sale of artifacts such as the bronze guns Victory carried, which is not allowed under the terms of the UNESCO Annex.

As if that was not enough bad news for Odyssey and its stockholders, who have been repeatedly told that HMS Victory would be “monetised” starting in the Summer of 2012, the 23 June edition of the Times newspaper saw the publication of a letter from Mr Richard Temple West, a direct descendent of Admiral Sir John Balchen who was lost in the Victory sinking.

After stating that he had been following the fate of the Victory with “increasing dismay,” Mr Temple West expressed concern that the decisions about HMS Victory were being made behind closed doors with scant regard for the site’s status as the grave and memorial to over 1000 mariners, including his ancestor, Sir John Balchen.

Mr Temple West stated his family recognised the historical importance of HMS Victory and for that reason asked that any investigation of the site should be led by expert archaeologists with no financial interest in the results and be carried out for the benefit of the people of the UK.

He concluded his letter with a devastating critique of what many see as the motivation behind the Odyssey/Maritime Heritage Foundation project…

“Most important of all, my ancestor’s grave must not be used by advertising men to pretend that the profit-seeking activities of a treasure hunting company are archaeology done in the public interest.”

Mr Temple West’s intervention undermines the key plank of Odysseys public relations strategy, maintained since the announcement of the finding of HMS Victory in February 2009, which has been to suggest that the descendants of Admiral Balchen support their plan.

Odyssey has been able to do this because of the association of the project with Lord Lingfield.  At the time of the February 2009 announcement and press conference, Lord Lingfield was still plain Sir Robert Balchin and he was introduced as a “descendant” of the Admiral in Odyssey’s Press Release; a claim which was then repeated in the press conference and in a television interview with Fox Business.

Heritage Daily now understands that the precise family relationship between Lord Lingfield and Admiral Balchen is almost certainly much more distant.  That is if it exists at all.  This of course raises the question as to why the claim of direct kinship was made by Odyssey in its press release in the first place?

In the meantime,  whatever Lord Lingfield’s precise relationship with the historical Admiral Sir John Balchen, direct descendants of the Admiral clearly see the plans of Odyssey and Lord Lingfield’s Foundation to mount a for-profit salvage of the shipwreck as little better than grave robbing.

 

Written by Andy Brockman

HeritageDaily : Archaeology News : Archaeology Press Releases

 

Download the HeritageDaily mobile application on iOS and Android

More on this topic

LATEST NEWS

10 British Iron Age Hill Forts

A hill fort is a type of earthworks used as a fortified refuge or defended settlement, located to exploit a rise in elevation for defensive advantage.

Stabiae – The Roman Resort Buried by Mount Vesuvius

Stabiae was an ancient Roman town and seaside resort near Pompeii, that was largely buried during the AD 79 eruption of Mount Vesuvius in present-day Italy.

Astronomers Accurately Measure the Temperature of Red Supergiant Stars

Red supergiants are a class of star that end their lives in supernova explosions. Their lifecycles are not fully understood, partly due to difficulties in measuring their temperatures. For the first time, astronomers develop an accurate method to determine the surface temperatures of red supergiants.

Researchers Overturn Hypothesis That Ancient Mammal Ancestors Moved Like Modern Lizards

The backbone is the Swiss Army Knife of mammal locomotion. It can function in all sorts of ways that allows living mammals to have remarkable diversity in their movements.

Archaeologists Discover one of Poland’s Largest Megalithic Tomb Complexes

Archaeologists excavating in Poland have discovered a large megalithic complex, containing several dozen tombs dating from 5500 years ago.

New Technology Allows Scientists First Glimpse of Intricate Details of Little Foot’s Life

In June 2019, an international team brought the complete skull of the 3.67-million-year-old Little Foot Australopithecus skeleton, from South Africa to the UK and achieved unprecedented imaging resolution of its bony structures and dentition in an X-ray synchrotron-based investigation at the UK's national synchrotron, Diamond Light Source.

Neandertals Had Capacity to Perceive and Produce Human Speech

Neandertals -- the closest ancestor to modern humans -- possessed the ability to perceive and produce human speech, according to a new study published by an international multidisciplinary team of researchers including Binghamton University anthropology professor Rolf Quam and graduate student Alex Velez.

Almost 600 Cats and Dogs Excavated in Ancient Pet Cemetery

Excavations of the early Roman port of Berenice in Egypt have unearthed the remains of nearly 600 cats and dogs from an ancient pet cemetery thought to be the earliest known yet discovered dating from 2000 years ago.

Popular stories

Ani – The Abandoned Medieval City

Ani is a ruined medieval city, and the former capital of the Bagratid Armenian kingdom, located in the Eastern Anatolia region of the Kars province in present-day Turkey.

Interactive Map of Earth’s Asteroid and Meteor Impact Craters

Across the history of our planet, around 190 terrestrial impact craters have been identified that still survive the Earth’s geological processes, with the most recent event occurring in 1947 at the Sikhote-Alin Mountains of south-eastern Russia.

The Sunken Town of Pavlopetri

Pavlopetri, also called Paulopetri, is a submerged ancient town, located between the islet of Pavlopetri and the Pounta coast of Laconia, on the Peloponnese peninsula in southern Greece.

Exploring the Avebury Stone Circle Landscape

The area was designated part of the Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites by UNESCO in 1986, in recognition for one of the most architecturally sophisticated stone circles in the world, in addition to the rich Neolithic, and Bronze age remains found nearby, such as the West Kennet Avenue, Beckhampton Avenue, West Kennet Long Barrow, the Sanctuary, and Windmill Hill.