The pony galloped as fast as it was able to without losing its footing. The rhythmic thud of hooves upon the frosted ground reverberated through the early morning mist that sent nearby birds scattering into the sharp, frosty wind which cut through the air like a knife.
The riders face was set in a determined stare, well aware of the importance of the message he was carrying, and that the lives of every man, woman and child depended on him reaching his destination. The track was well known and worn, as the miles flew by, man and pony as one; they passed the monuments to his ancestors, but he did not notice. The future of his tribe was all that mattered now, and at the termination of this track were the only people who could help.
There are many ancient tracks criss-crossing Britain, some known, others lost to the annals of history. Well known ones have been used through the ages and improved upon by the multitude of people who have been born, migrated to, and invaded the British Isles.
The Icknield Way is commonly known and referred to as an ancient track that stretches from the Wessex Downs to Norfolk. Accepted as being one of the original Green Roads of Britain it is believed to date from the Neolithic period and associated with trade, exchange and long distance communication. But is this road really just a myth that has grown up around a legend, and through the process of time and historical Chinese whispers, been turned into something that never actually existed?
Sarah Harrison (2003) in her paper, The Icknield Way: Some Queries shows how, over time, perceptions and thinking can change, and along with it, the notion that although backed by early archaeological evidence, the scientific discipline is keeping an open mind in relation to new findings that may debunk earlier opinions.
So what is the Icknield Way and where does the story of its existence originate? In the nineteenth century, Guest (1857) stated it appears in Anglo-Saxon Charters. Harrison (2003) looked at the Medieval sources, and notes that the Icknield Way, appears first in the Medieval literature as part of the fictional ‘Four Highways’ story in Henry of Huntingdon’s Historia Anglorum (c.1131). The gist of the story at this early stage was that the four highways – the three Roman roads, Ermine Street, Fosse Way and Watling Street, together with the Icknield Way – were constructed ‘by Royal authority’ across the island of Britain, ‘on which no one would dare attack his enemy’ (Harrison 2003,1)
Geoffrey of Monmouth in his work, Historia Regum Britannie (c.1136), identifies the Four Highways as being part of the story of the mythical King Belinus, (Lay & Vance 1999, 59) but only names the Fosse Way, and Cooper (cited in Harrison 2003) calls the Four Highways a ‘twelfth century myth’.
If the road was only added to the King’s protection due to it being associated with a legend, then this may be the reason why the Fosse Way, Ermine Street and Watling Street were all incorporated and used by the Romans and later generations as identifiable cross-country routes, but the Icknield Way was not. However, the fact that it was named at all shows there must have been a road or trackway already in existance, possibly with that name.
With Geoffrey’s work being considered mostly mythical in itself, was the Fosse Way only mentioned to place some element of truth behind his writing and making it more acceptable as fact?He cites Anglo-Norman attempts to discover the laws of Edward the Confessor which William had promised to uphold, a developing romantic interest in England’s past, and more prosaically, legal disputes over the extent of the via regia, since in this period the matter of jurisdiction was often hotly contested (Harrison 2003, 3).
The medieval period is also responsible for the stories of Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table which people still believe today to be fact and go in search of evidence to prove just so. But what facts can be brought to light to demonstrate that the Icknield Way did indeed exist as an ancient cross-country trackway?
Reed (1997) explains, ‘Law books of the twelfth century list Watling Street, Ermine Street, the Fosse Way, and Icknield Way as being Royal roads, Chimini regales’ Reed (1997, 268). The special protection meant that people were able to travel safely along the route without fear of being ambushed or attacked, and if a person was, then it would be ‘considered to be an offence against the king himself’ (Messchaele 1997, 196).
During the thirteenth century road crime appears to have still been present for during this century more laws were being enforced which led to the Statute of Winchester in 1285, declaring the rights of way along roads and byways,
[The King] Ordered that highways leading from one market town another should be broadened so that there was neither dyke, tree nor bush where a man could lurk and do harm within 200 feet of either side of the road (Reed 1997, 268).
The clearing of the road sides for up to 200 feet would leave some evidence of clearing, however, with the amount of agriculture and general disturbance over the centuries there would be virtually no archaeological evidence to show this.
The oldest map of the route is mentioned by Guest (1857) as an ‘Extremely rude map, which professes to represent the courses of the Four Roads…. it carries the Icknield Street from Bury St Edmunds to Salisbury’ (Guest 1857, 109). We are told that the map is part of the Cotton Manuscripts dating from the thirteenth century. Unfortunately copies are not available, and if we could obtain one how could we be certain that the track illustrated actually followed an original route? Or would its course be as mythical as the tale told about its origin like King Belinus? Peake (1939) informs us that ‘there are not, nor ever were, four Royal roads’ (Peake 1939, 445).
The citing of the Four Roads in literature has become known as fact down through the ages, however, in the nineteenth century some started to question them. Beldam (1868) in The Archaeological Journal states there are ‘numerous roads of ancient, though often uncertain origin’ (Beldham 1868, 21) and he goes on to add,
Many of them have undergone such changes from the lapse of time, the occupation of later races, or the encroachments of modern civilizations, that the original marks and traces are often almost obliterated (Beldam 1868, 21-22).
This leads to an understanding that only the best known and well-worn routes were kept over time. In 1897, Green, in his book, The Making of England states, ‘It was along the Icknield Way, therefore, that the West Saxons would naturally have pushed into the heart of the island’ (Green 1897, 122). Here we have an author who has totally believed that the route existed as a means of crossing the country to reach an inland destination. However, in the early twentieth century Belloc (1907), comments in the Historic Times that,
For the Icknield Way was but a vague barbarian track, often tortuous in outline, confused by branching ways, and presenting all features of a savage trail (Belloc 1907, 42).
Although there were questions being posed about the Icknield Way, throughout the twentieth century support for it as being one long continuous track began to take hold, and Feldman (1988, 105) commented in The Cambridge Law Journal that the Icknield Way was one of the four great Roman roads.
The native roads that the Romans paved and made their own, as already mentioned were the Fosse Way, Ermine Street and Watling Street. Surely, if the Icknield Way existed at that time as a major cross-country route, it would have had the same fate as the others. But it does not and this begs the question as to why?
The Icknield Way is known to make use of the chalk escarpments for most of its route, and also along these areas are the remains of hillforts, tombs, barrows and burials. This evidence has given weight to the belief that a route existed.
Archaeological evidence is not very convincing as lines can be drawn between any number of areas and statistics can be made to fit around anything. Fox (1923) was wary about relating finds to the Icknield Way,
But in a countryside so fully occupied from earliest of times the evidential value of the majority of the finds cannot be rated very highly (Fox 1923, 147). The placing of hillforts ‘along’ the Icknield Way merely show that the chalk uplands were defended; barrows and tombs were placed in prominent positions as a reminder to people of their ancestors, were they could be viewed,
That the Icknield Way was used even more extensively during the Bronze Age is apparent from the way in which round barrows occur on either side at intervals over almost its whole length (Grinsell 1953, 198).
This can also be described as being the place favoured for the burial of ancestors and those wishing to visit them, resulting in movement between lowland areas and the uplands. Grinsell (1953) believed the barrows to be proof that the trackway existed, however, Harrison (2003) states,
There is even less in the way of excavated evidence for the route ….By the late twentieth century the idea of zones of communication had become accepted and modern archaeologists were thus removed from the immediate problem of having to find the route (Harrison 2003, 11).
The above demonstrates the frustrating issue of having to explain the existence of the route when there is no concrete evidence that it ever really existed. So how do we actually know it did exist as some of the earliest written evidence comes from a mythical legend?
There is no definite answer. People have, and are entitled to, their own views and beliefs. For one person to say their way or belief is right and everyone else is incorrect, needs to develop an open mind. The Icknield Way may have grown up out of a legend, and trackways linked to try and prove its course, to satisfy the roads protected by the king,
This way, I conceive, was known by some general term such as “ox-drove” in the language in use at that time, and this term, much corrupted no doubt, became converted by the Saxons into the Icknield Way (Peake 1939, 446).
Others believe the Icknield Way exists due to its name, it was the trackway of the Iceni tribe of Norfolk (Marr 1904; Guest 1857; Beldam 1868; Lydekker 1909); some that as similar cultural material has been found at either end that it confirms it existed.
Yet this may demonstrate that there were links between the two tribes, possibly through marriage arrangements or trade (Morris & Jordon 1910; Fox 1923; Grinsell 1953; Poole 1987; Blair & Keynes 2003; McDonald 2004; Ackroyd 2011); Sayles (1950) describes it as an invasion route used by the Saxons coming in through the Wash and heading inland to the Upper Thames; Fanthorpe and Fanthorpe (1999) believe it to have possibly been used by Boudicca when she rebelled against Roman rule; and two authors (Robbins 2005; and Webb (2000) describe the route as being a Pilgrim Way ‘servicing turnings for both Ely and Bury St. Edmunds’ (Webb 2000, 229). Each of these authors put forward their views as to why they believe the Icknield Way does exist.
Reasons given by others not convinced of one continuous track from Norfolk to the Wessex Downs include the lack of towns that usually show up along major route ways (Guest 1857; Harden 1956); a number of roads exist with the same name in different counties (Ogilvie 1952; Cameron 1961); the road has been referred to by different names with different spelling in the counties it runs through leading to a confusion of names and spelling (Bayley 1919); in some areas there are two parallel tracks with the same name (Walker 1953); the Icknield Way is not mentioned on early maps (Birkholz 2004); the course of the track is unclear (Hippsley Cox 1914); and there is a distinct lack of direst evidence (Darvill & Darvill 2009).
The amount of writing and discussion around the Icknield Way shows that there is an interest to find whether the road existed as one continuous track, if it was a number of tracks joined together, and what its possible uses may have been. The fact that it is named in the Anglo-Saxon Charters gives one the impression that it must have existed. However, in Medieval times the roads origins are placed in myth and legend, and people have been trying to locate a route.
The fact that it was not taken up and used by the Romans throws some doubt about it existing at the time of the Roman period, hence questioning its age. The first mention of the track in the Anglo-Saxon charters, makes one believe in its existence, however, having it mentioned as coming from a mythical legend in the Medieval time places an element of doubt as to its authenticity.
We will probably never know the true answer and as with most archaeology where there is no concrete evidence, we can only hypothesise – there is no right or wrong.
Written by Sue Carter
HeritageDaily : Archaeology News : Archaeology Press Releases
References and Bibliography
Ackroyd. P 2011. Foundation. London: Macmillan.
Allcroft. A. H. 1908. Earthwork of England: Prehistoric, Roman, Saxon, Danish, Norman and Mediæval. London: Macmillan & Co. Ltd.
Babington. C. C. 1853. Ancient Cambridgeshire: or An Attempt to Trace Roman and Other Ancient Roads that Passed Through the County of Cambridge. Cambridge : Deighton.
Bailey. M. 1989. A Marginal Economy? East Anglian Breckland in the Later Middle Ages. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bayley. H. 1919. Archaic England: An Essay in Deciphering Prehistory from Megalithic Monuments Part One. London: Chapman and Hall.
Belloc. H. 1907. The Historic Times. London: J.M. Dent and Co..
Belloc. H. 1912. Warfare in England. London: Thornton Butterworth Limited.
Beldam. J. 1868. The Icenhilde Road. The Archaeological Journal, Vol. XXV, pp. 21-45.
Biddulph. K. 2008. Neolithic to Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: A Resource Assessment 2008. Buckinghamshire County Council. Available from http://www.buckscc.gov.uk/assets/content/bcc/docs/archaeology/A_ST_Bucks_4_Neo-EBA_Bucks_resource_assessment_final.pdf. Accessed 14 and 20th January 2012.
Blair. P. H., & Keynes. S. 2003. An Introduction to Anglo-Saxon England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Birkholz. D.2004. The King’s Two Maps: Cartography and Culture in Thirteenth Century England. Oxon: Routledge.
Cameron. K 1961. English Place Names. London: Batsford Ltd.
Darby. H. C. 1938. The Cambridge Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Darvill. Prof. T. C., & Darvill. T. 2009. Prehistoric Britain. Oxon: Taylor Francis.
Fanthorpe. L., & Fanthorpe. P. 1999. The World’s Most Mysterious Places. Toronto: Dundurn Press.
Feldman. D. 1988. The Kings Peace, the Royal Prerogative and Public Order: The Roots and Early Development of Binding over Powers. The Cambridge Law Journal, Vol. 47, No. 1 (Mar., 1988), pp.101-128.
Fleming. R. 1983. Domesday Estates of The King and the Godwines: A Study in Late Saxon Politics. Speculum, Vol. 58, No. 4 (Oct., 1983), pp. 987-1007.
Fleming. R. 1985. Monastic Lands and England’s Defence in the Viking Age. The English Historical Review, Vol. 100, No. 395 (Ap., 1985), pp. 247-265.
Fox C. 1923. The Archaeology of the Cambridge Region. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Green. J. R. 1897. The Making of England. London: Macmillan & Co.
Grinsell. L. V. 1953. The Ancient Burial Mounds of England. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd..
Guest. E.1857. The Four Roman Ways. The Archaeological Journal, Vol. XIV, pp. 99-118.
Harden. D. B. 1956. Dark-Age Britain. Oxon: Taylor Francis.
Harding. A. F. 2000. European Societies in the Bronze Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harrison. S. 2003. The Icknield Way: Some Queries. The Archaeological Journal, Vol. 160, pp. 1-22.
Hippisley Cox. R. 1914. The Green Roads of England. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd..
Kilbride-Jones. H. E. 1980. Celtic Craftsmanship in Bronze. Oxon: Taylor Francis.
Kirby. D. P. 1965. Problems of Early West Saxon History. The English Historical Review, Vol. 80, No. 314 (Jan., 1965), pp. 10-29.
Lay. M. G., & Vance. J. E.1999. Ways of the World: A History of the World’s Roads and the Vehicles That Used Them. North Carolina: Rutgers University Press.
Lydekker. R 1909. Cambridge County Geographies: Hertfordshire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Marr. J. E. 1904. Handbook to the Natural History of Cambridgeshire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McDonald. G. 2004. England. London: New Holland Publishers.
Messchaele. J. 1997. Peasants, Merchants and Markets; Inland Trade in Medieval England, 1150-1350. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Milton. F. E. 1926. Local Lore – An Introduction to History. Edinburgh: Thomas Nelson & Sons.
Morris. J. E. & Jordon. H. R. 1910. An Introduction of the Study of Local History and Antiquity. London: Routledge.
Ogilvie. A. G. 1952. Great Britain: Essays in Regional Geography. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Peake. H. 1939. An Ancient Trackway on the English Down. Geographical Review. Vol. 29, No. 3 (Jul., 1939), pp. 431-446.
Piggott. S & Thirsk. J. 1981. The Agrarian History of England and Wales: Volume 1, Prehistory to AD 1042. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Poole. R. 1987. Skaldic Verse and Anglo-Saxon History: Some Aspects of the Period 1009-1016, Spectrum, Vol. 63, No. 2 (Apr., 1987), pp. 265-298.
Quennel. M. 1952. Everyday Life in Prehistoric Times. London: Batsford Publishing.
Reed. M.1997. The Landscape of Britain: From the Beginnings to 1914. Oxon: Routledge.
Rivet. A. L. F. & Jackson. K. 1970. The British Section of the Antonine Itinerary. Britannia, Vol. 1. (1970), pp. 34-82.
Robbins. P. 2005. The Walking Pilgrim. Routes in Britain: Icknield Way. Available from www.pilgrim.peterrobbins.co.uk/britain/icknield.html.
Accessed 20 January 2012.
Salmon. A. L. 1910. Cambridge County Geographies: Dorset. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Sayles. G. O. 1950. The Medieval Foundations of England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Sharpe. M. 1919. Middlesex in British, Roman and Saxon Times. London: G. Bell and Sons Ltd.
Slater. T., & Goose. N. 2008. A County of Small Towns: The Development of Hertfordshire’s Urban Landscape to 1800. Hertford: University of Hertford Press.
Wacher. J. S. 2000. A Portrait of Roman Britain. Oxon: Routledge.
Walker. F. 1953. Geography From the Air. London: Methuen & Co. Ltd..
Webb. D. 2000. Pilgrimage in Medieval England. London: Continuum International Publishing Group.